{"id":1337,"date":"2022-04-21T00:11:08","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T00:11:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/index.php\/settlement\/california-tinder-age-bias-class-action-settlement\/"},"modified":"2022-04-21T01:45:09","modified_gmt":"2022-04-21T01:45:09","slug":"california-tinder-age-bias-class-action-settlement","status":"publish","type":"settlement","link":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/settlement\/california-tinder-age-bias-class-action-settlement\/","title":{"rendered":"California Tinder Age Bias Class Action Settlement"},"content":{"rendered":"

California love seekers have succeeded in securing a $17.3 million from the Tinder age bias class action settlement.<\/p>\n

Are you 29 or older and purchase a subscription to Tinder Plus or Tinder Gold between March 2, 2015, and March 1, 2019? If yes, then you could get compensation.<\/p>\n

What is Tinder?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Tinder is a very famous dating app that allows people to connect with others in their nearby areas.<\/p>\n

What is Tinder Class Action Lawsuit?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Tinder class action lawsuit is all about the age discrimination done by the Tinder app for a subscription.  A California woman claimed that the Tinder app did age discrimination in its deluxe versions of the app.<\/p>\n

According to the Tinder age bias class action lawsuit, the users 29 or older were charged more as compared to others for Tinder Plus and Tinder Gold membership.<\/p>\n

Further, the class action lawsuit claimed that the users under the age of 29 got a fifty percent discount to subscribe to the Gold or Plus version of the app.<\/p>\n

According to plaintiff Lisa Kim, this pricing structure of the Tinder app was discriminatory. However, Tinder contended that the pricing structure only reflected the preferred price for various age groups.<\/p>\n

moreover, the plaintiff said that the pricing structure for Tinder Plus and Tinder Gold violated the California anti-discrimination laws. Moreover, the app made a difference in pricing depending upon the age of users.<\/p>\n

Under the terms and conditions of the Tinder age bias class action settlement, the dating company will pay $17.3 million to the Class Members.<\/p>\n

However, the Class Members who still subscribe to the Tinder app will receive 50 \u201cSuper Likes\u201d at no costs. Super Likes are a premium feature of the application which benefits members for $1 and allows them to enhance their profile.<\/p>\n

Further, to get the benefits the class members need to file a valid claim before the deadline. The Members who submit Claim Forms can receive one of three awards. The award is $25 cash, an additional 25 Super Likes,or free one-month subscription to the Tinder app.<\/p>\n

Note:<\/strong> Class Members need to submit the Unique Claim ID provided on the Notice to them. Those who do not receive any notice can contact at Settlement Administrator at 1-888-437-2280.<\/p>\n

Potential Award<\/strong><\/h2>\n

$25<\/p>\n

Deadline to file the claim<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Click here to file the claim!<\/a><\/p>\n

Details of the filed case<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Case name<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Kim v. Tinder Inc., et al.,<\/em><\/p>\n

Case No. 2:18-cv-03093,<\/p>\n

in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Final hearing<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

06\/17\/2019<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Claims administrator<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Kim v. Tinder
\nc\/o Epiq
\nP.O. Box 3219
\nPortland, OR 97208-3219
\n1-888-437-2280<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

California love seekers have succeeded in securing a $17.3 million from the Tinder age bias class action settlement. Are you 29 or older and purchase a subscription to Tinder Plus or Tinder Gold between March 2, 2015, and March 1, 2019? If yes, then you could get compensation. What is Tinder? Tinder is a very […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1072,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/settlement\/1337"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/settlement"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/settlement"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/settlement\/1337\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1373,"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/settlement\/1337\/revisions\/1373"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claimsmatch.co\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}